Skip to content
Molina VerdictOpinion & analysis

Molina Verdict: Opinion and analysis by Gabriel D. Molina

The latest essayGambling policy

Brazil's betting ban is the wrong move: tax and regulate the market

Gabriel D. MolinaPublished 28 min read

The Verdict Opinion summary

Banning betting is the wrong move: a moderately taxed, regulated market limits harm better and keeps jobs and revenue.

Read the essay

Latest verdicts

Gambling policy

Britain's 40% duty on online gaming will push more players to the black market

Remote Gaming Duty rose from 21% to 40% on 1 April 2026, and the government's own forecasts assume most of it reaches players as worse prices and payouts, with illegal sites named as a destination. Nobody has measured how many players have gone. A medium tax with real enforcement, the route US alcohol and cannabis policy points to, keeps more of them, and more revenue, in the licensed market.

The Verdict Opinion summary

Raising remote gaming duty to 40% will push more players to illegal sites; moderate tax plus real enforcement holds more.

Published

About the author

Gabriel D. MolinaFounder & Editor-in-Chief, Molina Verdict

Opinion and commentary on Molina Verdict. Read the profile.