The latest essayGambling policy
Brazil's betting ban is the wrong move: tax and regulate the market
The Verdict Opinion summary
Banning betting is the wrong move: a moderately taxed, regulated market limits harm better and keeps jobs and revenue.
The latest essayGambling policy
The Verdict Opinion summary
Banning betting is the wrong move: a moderately taxed, regulated market limits harm better and keeps jobs and revenue.
Gambling policy
Remote Gaming Duty rose from 21% to 40% on 1 April 2026, and the government's own forecasts assume most of it reaches players as worse prices and payouts, with illegal sites named as a destination. Nobody has measured how many players have gone. A medium tax with real enforcement, the route US alcohol and cannabis policy points to, keeps more of them, and more revenue, in the licensed market.
The Verdict Opinion summary
Raising remote gaming duty to 40% will push more players to illegal sites; moderate tax plus real enforcement holds more.
Gabriel D. MolinaFounder & Editor-in-Chief, Molina Verdict
Opinion and commentary on Molina Verdict. Read the profile.